The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  18th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
I. Working Group on Local Government
Author(s)  Catalin Daniel Dumitrica 
  National School of Political Studies and Public Administration
Bucharest  Romania
 
 
 Title  Development regions between joining-up and decentralising reform. A possible solution?
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
UPDATED VERSION:

Keywords: regional development, local government, joined-up government, administrative and financial decentralization, development indicators;
This paper is a follow-up of the research begun last year - "Building a metropolitan area model for the Romanian administrative space" - focusing this time on the regional implications that the emergence of new administrative structures - metropolitan areas - can lead to, in building a regional development model that can be applied in the Romanian administrative space.
The paper suggests a number of conclusions regarding the economic implications, from a number of existing models of development, focusing on theories of localization (model von Thunen, Weber model), interdependence localization (Hotelling model) and the theory of central places (Model of Christaller, Losch, Zipf).

Based on these economic theories and the implications of metropolitan areas on the regional development process, the paper aims to develop a set of indicators to identify and measure the intensity and quality of migration - a result of the emergence and development of the filtering phenomenon from the metropolitan areas to the peripheral areas and the extent to which this phenomenon contributes to reducing regional disparities.
Special attention will be given to local government, through a direct relating to the coordination process and to the identification and the possibility of applying the concept of joined-up government at the level of metropolitan areas.
From this regard, the concept of decentralization will be presented, the author going to ascertain that financial decentralization should stop at the metropolitan area level and be aimed, on the basis of the principle of specialization (one of the establishing principles of metropolitan areas), especially at the areas of responsibility delegated to exercise by the local governments, this set of core competencies representing the area of implementation of the concept of joined-up government.
The applicability of the joined-up government concept can be seen as a first measure that the administrative system can generate and implement, through a comprehensive process aimed at rethinking the operation and the organization of the administrative structures. Delegation of powers, at the level of specific organisms, can be interpreted, as an anti-crisis measures.
The role of those organisms is to coordinate the implementation process of the anti-crisis policies throughout the entire region, contributing to the coherence and the effectiveness of these policies.
From the perspective of this paper, metropolitan areas should act as a middle government, representing the place of convergence for the decentralization process and joined-up government process.
The entire analysis will focus on the Romanian development regions, the set of indicators developed having, initially, a general nature that can subsequently be adapted to the regional-metropolitan specificity.