The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  18th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
IV. Working Group on PA Reform
Author(s)  Iwona Sobis 
  Goteborg University
Göteborg  Sweden
de Vries Michiel, Michiel S. de Vries 
 
 Title  Restoring professionalism:What can public administration learn from theories on inter-organizational behaviour?
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
The last two years we were focusing on the issue of professionalism when providing technical assistance to CEE countries during their transition to a market economy. In conformity with Brint's classification, we have identi-fied two types of professionals in the western aid-business i.e., trustee-professionals and expert-professionals. Although we saw a massive exit of trustee professionals, we have been advocating the return of these trustee-professionals in organizations (See Sobis and & De Vries, 2009).
This paper addresses the question what theories on inter-organizational behaviour tell us what to do to improve performance. What do these theories tell about managing complex projects and what clues it gives to accom-plishing cooperation between trustee-professionals in such a network? We talk about complex networks, because a.o. members of such networks are not necessary coming from one and the same organization. Opposite, they are recruited from different organizational settings and they create project together and an organization in itself.
This paper departs from inter-organizational theory. What can public administration learn from these theories and what do such theories tell about optimal steering of professionals.
Thus, the paper is rather theoretical in its character. It starts with an overview of the aforementioned theories and continues with the lessons learned from them. It is concluded by a critical reflection on the theories and the suggestions following from it.