The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  17th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
III. Working Group on Civil Service
Author(s)  Kaja Gadowska 
  Jagiellonian University
Krakow  Poland
 
 
 Title  Law in action. The problem of political patronage in the process of appointing high-rank posts in civil service in Poland
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Civil service is one of the key elements of government administration and exerts fundamental impact on functioning of the state. Nevertheless, public administration in post-communist states is particularly vulnerable to political patronage and cronyism, due to unequal statutes of political and administrative spheres and underdevelopment of professional civil service. Politicians try to extend their control of personnel policy into the public administration. Senior positions in the administration are regarded as political spoils. Consequently, administrative autonomy is seriously undermined.
In my paper I will try to identify the sources of malfunction in the politico-administrative relations in Poland e.g. communist legacy, supremacy of particularistic values within national culture and ascendancy of parliament over the administration, in consequence of which politicians tend to abuse their offices in order to exert pressure on the administration.
The aim of the paper is to assess to what extent the actual relation between politics and administration reflects the principles contained in the 1996 and 1998 Civil Service Acts and the presently in force 2006 Act on Civil Service and the one on the State Staffing Pool and High-rank State Posts.
Special attention will be dedicated to identifying the practices of subsequent governments aimed at delaying the civil service development and adopting temporary measures, in form of Amendments to Civil Service Act, which would create loopholes for the politicization of administration. I am going to concentrate on the policy towards senior positions in public administration, especially of directors general in ministries, other central institutions and regional offices as these positions are critical to gain and preserve direct control over civil service by politicians.
I will argue that the most significant negative feature hindering the development of a professional civil service and its stability has been a wide-scale practice of employing in senior positions in public administration political appointees. Patron-client relations between politics and administration violate the separation of state’s constituent components and their respective areas of operation.