The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  17th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
V. Working Group on Public Sector Finance and Accounting
Author(s)  Paata Mirziashvili 
  International Center for Civic Culture
Tbilisi  Georgia
Gerkeuli Nino,  
 
 Title  Asset management practice in Georgia: Case study of Mtskheta municipality
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
The current situation in municipal asset management practise in Mtskheta municipality is offered to be a subject to discussion at the next NISPA conference in Budva.

Based on author’s knowledge and personal experience (who has been a head of local government in this particular municipality for years) the process of property transfer discussed within the framework of legal and budgetary reforms and in-depth analysis of current state of affairs will be presented using a case study of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Mtskheta Municipality.

This paper has an ambition to be the first scholarly study trying to identify the reasons why theory and practice differ in the area of MSWM in Georgia. It will review all levels of management vertically: state, local, public, and track whole cycle horizontally: from households to landfill discussing all related aspects-legal, financial, environmental, ethical, etc. It will give precise available data and in-depth analysis of existing gaps. Authors argue that approach to MSWM in Georgia is disintegrated because of improper allocation and management of municipal assets and that significant, but reasonable afforts are required to make the process effective and transparent.

The choice justification:
Mtskheta is an old capital and a Cultural Heritage site located in 21 km-s from the Capital of Georgia Tbilisi. Municipality involves sanitary zone of Tbilisi water-supply system (Aragvi gorge) and Mukhrani Valley the main supplier of Tbilisi markets with agricultural products. Some specialized objects considered as a high risk (like Jail for those diseased with tubercular prisoners) are located within the municipal borders as well. There are 36 settlements in Mtskheta municipality with population – 59 700. Municipal solid waste disposal is not provided in most settlements. Only administrative center – City where 12% of municipality population resides – is cleaned up on a daily basis. There is no legally registered landfill in Municipality. The situation in this regard is similar to most municipalities. Exploration of complicated relationships between different stakeholders involved in the process along with legal and budgetary constraints will well illustrate many features of property-related issues in a changing "world" (circumstances).