The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  17th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
V. Working Group on Public Sector Finance and Accounting
Author(s)  Marketa Rezuchova 
  Masaryk University
Brno  Czech Republic
 
 
 Title  Factors influencing the choice of the public service provider
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Local government guarantees wide spectrum of public goods and services as a result of public choice. Within this concept local governments must face pressure of their citizens on quality and quantity of various public services. Therefore public subjects are forced on looking for the most efficient public service providing method because of limited public financial sources. Hence public service (co)financing is given to the forefront. Private (co)financing is realized through different types of Public private partnerships (PPP). As this method has many pros and cons, it is quite difficult for local government to get the “better value for money”. It is possible only through professional decision-making process of public service providing. As a result of many researches on this field (Ochrana (2007), Beblavý (2007), Pavel, Němec, Meričková), public sector - local government (especially municipalities) is behind with this area.

The paper analyses, how selected economic criteria of decision-making process (such as public service characteristic, public service providing costs, public service demand) influence the choice of (1) the public services´ provider and (2) public services financing method. The contribution is based on the hypothesis that any public service (both collective and toll good) guaranteed by the public authority (local government) could be provided by the private organisation as well. Therefore the choice of relevant provider is logically focused on choosing the one who will guarantee better service quality and cost effectiveness (in other words, the better value for money). The aim of this paper is to specify basic principles which the public service guarantor (local government) should respect during the decision-making process.This model is subsequently being tested for concrete municipal public services.

The first part of the paper identifies and discusses the crucial characteristics of public services based on the relevant literature review. In the second part, the selected economic criteria are then analyzed in order to specify the optimal provider (public/private; for profit/not for profit) for different types of local public services. The author designs a scheme which determines optimal type of provider and optimal financing method for local public services. This scheme is tested on the Czech municipalities in the concluding part of the paper.