The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  17th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
I. Working Group on Local Government
Author(s)  Desislava Stoilova 
  South-West University “Neofit Rilski”
Blagoevgrad  Bulgaria
 
 
 Title  City-regions - Engines or blockers of fiscal decentralization in Bulgaria
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Urbanization process in Bulgaria is not an entirely new phenomenon. During the entire period of the second half of the 20th century the rural population diminished for the account of an increase of the urban population. Since 1990 the urbanization process has rapidly evolved. As a consequence, the historically established dispersed point structure of the human settlements network was destroyed. Large cities have spatially grown, disrupting the former compact structure and developing settlement formations of a new type, namely urban agglomerations. Large cities evolved as powerful centers with diverse regional functions, concentrating manufacture, business, commerce and banking, tourism, health care, university education, science, research and development activities, culture and spiritual life. These highly urbanized areas consist of the large cities and the agglomeration formations gravitating around them. They occupy 15% of the country’s territory. Because of the high population density, which is continuously increasing, local governments in the urbanized centers fail to meet adequately the citizens’ demand for housing, services, transportation, public utilities, healthy and clean environment.
Parallel to the formation of urban agglomerations the problem of the so-called “peripheral areas” evolved, due to the underdeveloped settlements and negligible population density. Poorly urbanized peripheral areas are usually the underdeveloped rural, mountainous and border areas, which occupy approximately 80% of the country’s territory. These are areas with low population density and disperse structure of villages and small towns, situated at a great distance from the large cities. Sucked away by the urbanization process, these human settlements bear the characteristics of the periphery – underdevelopment, low living standards, steadily diminishing population and functions, predominantly agricultural orientation. The economic, social, environmental, and cultural problems faced by the local governments in the peripheral areas grew into general regional problems of the spatial development.
The main purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the role of the city-regions in the context of the fiscal decentralization reform in Bulgaria. Obviously, city-regions dominate the life of the country; they attract human and financial resources, causing severe disparities in the socio-economic development. In the process of striving for fiscal decentralization, city-regions divert resources to the detriment of the underdeveloped peripheral areas thus centralizing economic, social and political life. The paper is focused on the main achievements and crucial challenges of the fiscal decentralization process in Bulgaria, outlining the possible scenarios for the future of the city-regions, both engines and blockers of the fiscal decentralization.