The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  17th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
IV. Working Group on PA Reform in CEE&CA
Author(s)  Iwona Sobis 
  Goteborg University
Göteborg  Sweden
de Vries Michiel, Michiel S. de Vries 
 
 Title  Restoring professionalism: What can public administration learn from social psychology?
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Administrative reform is about changing structures, institutions and about changing the attitudes, motives and work conduct of the people working within those structures. In our previous research (Sobis & De Vries, 2004,. 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008) into the process of technical assistance to governments in CEE countries in transition during the period 1990-2004 we found that the flaws that were visible were especially caused by the emergence of a new form of professionalism that became dominant in recent years. This is a kind of professionalism in which standard setting, aiming for financial gains, keeping up appearances, goal-orientation, being detached and just having a higher education are dominant instead of showing commitment and empathy, having the clients interest in mind, building expertise, seeing solutions as contingent and starting with a diagnosis of the problems.
The increasing dominance of practices to change the attitudes, motives and working conduct of public officials in this direction has mainly been influenced by spread of principles of new public management [NPM]. This approach, however, has proven to have serious negative side-effects. This paper starts by describing this approach and its side-effects and continues by investigating alternative ways to change the basic assumptions, values, norms, and motives for behaviors and actual conduct of public officials. We examine whether these could be equally effective without having the negative side-effects that NPM seems to have and which do improve values and norms of effectiveness, efficiency, ethics, economy and equity. Finally, we will apply the findings to possibilities to improve public administration reform.
The main objective of this paper is to search for such solutions in research conducted within the discipline of social psychology. It is in this discipline that human behavior is seen as the result of the interaction of mental states and immediate social situations. What is to be learned from such investigations and how could this apply to organizations in the public sector? The investigation will be illustrated with findings from our previous research into the technical assistance by western advisors to the governments in CEE countries in transition.