The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  16th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
II. Working Group on E-government
Author(s)  Agnieszka Pawlowska 
  Rzeszow University
Rzeszow  Poland
 
 
 Title  Critical issues of e-government building – the case of public administration in Poland
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
An article is commenced with analysis of basic data concerning development of public e-services in Poland and comparison with equivalent data referring to other European countries. The overall assessment of e-government development in Poland shows considerable deficiency in public services delivered electronically.
The author identifies the following decisive issues of e-government development in Poland:
1. strategic management and leadership
2. monitoring of strategies’ implementation
3. projects’ management and leadership

The following hypotheses are formulated:
1. there is no comprehensive strategy of e-government development in Poland
2. there are no causal relations between strategies of e-government development and its legal basis
3. the process of implementing strategies is characterized by absence of stable and uniform leadership, as well as inefficient control of strategies’ implementation.
National policy of e-government development will be examined to elaborate hypotheses mentioned above. Also large ICT projects on national level will be brought about, their performance assessed and importance for overall development of e-government analyzed.
An issue of projects’ management and leadership will be discussed in reference to local administration. The author distinguishes the following significant aspects of local e-government building:
1. functional automation instead of ICT infrastructure building in municipal offices
2. absence of back-office and front-office integration
3. excessive variety of municipal information systems that prevents data interchange
In the absence of universal website for public e-services, e-government implementation of e-government project will be presented on an example of local administration, namely the case of Rybnik municipality, that endorsed original plan of electronic office supported by e-ticket, e-purse and e-signature.
In conclusions, author formulates several recommendations for municipalities to improve quality of ICT projects and speed up e-government development.