The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  15th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
IV. Working Group on Democratic Governance of Multiethnic...
Author(s)  Dea Chkhaidze 
  Foundation for Development of Human Resources
Tbilisi  Georgia
 
 
 Title  Case Study: First example of inclusion the management of interethnic relations course at PA School, Georgia
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Author: Ms. Dea Chkhaidze, social psychologist, Executive Director of Foundation for Development of Human Resources, Georgia

The research conducted by the author for the 14th NISPAcee conference demonstrated the lack of inclusion of the diversity management dimension and subjects into curricula of Public Administration pedagogical institutions in Georgia. The theme has been developed during last three months with the initiative and special effort of the Foundation for Development of Human Resources (FDHR) and OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities (OSCE/HCNM). This paper demonstrates the case of how can governmental sector and precisely public administration education system prosper in cooperation with the civic sector and its experience sharing.

The case describes the development of the cooperation between the FDHR and the Zhvania School of Public Administration (ZSPA) which was established by the Ministry of Education of Georgia in 2005 and serves to the target group – ethnic minorities and high mountainous regions representatives. The result of this cooperation became the inclusion of the Management of interethnic relations course (MIER) into the curricula of the school, which is the first example of teaching such subject in Georgian high education and specialized institutions.

The case includes the description of the curricula of the course and its methodology. The main themes covered by the curricula are: theories of the nationality formation and state structure/design in the ethnic-citizenship approach, culture and its aspects, identity formation, ethnic perceptions, ethnic stereotypes and discrimination and coping with negative thinking, international documents regulating the interethnic relations and protection of the minority rights.

As this is the first example, the result is not observable yet and it cannot be properly evaluated before the time passes and furthermore, the evaluation criteria/indicators have not been exercised yet as the school has only began its work in January 2006. We have not seen the school graduates in practice and have not observed the implementation of their knowledge on their job places, but the case demonstrates the positive feedback of participant-public servants and declares the need for broadening the target institutions list and giving the bigger space to the intercultural and interethnic relations learning in the Public Administration institutions.

The further implication proceeds from the practice: the curriculum has to be proposed to other PA schools and institutions in Georgia. There are only two Schools and few cathedras in the universities occupied the field of PA teaching. We assume that the administrators and organizers of these institutions will take the new concept and develop the curricula of diversity management at their cathedras. The case also demonstrates the effort of FDHR team to propose the created curricula of Management of interethnic relation to the cathedra of Public Servant at Tbilisi Technical University.