The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  15th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
General Session
Author(s)  Jan Pavel 
  University of Economics of Prague
Praha 3  Czech Republic
Jan Pavel Emilia Sicakova-Beblava 
 
 Title  Transparency of Public Procurement Market – Case of The Czech and Slovak Republic
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Public procurement is a very important instrument used for allocation of a major part of public expenditures. Because of its importance, guarantees of a transparent and professional system of public procurement should exist in every developed country. However, the reality in the CEE countries is different. A number of tenders are not open and therefore funding allocation is not transparent and possibly also not effective.

Over the last years, the size of the public procurement market in the CEE transition economies has increased. As of today, we estimate that public procurement in CEE represents more than 10 % of GDP (in case of the Czech Republic even 17 % of GDP).

The first part of our paper describes the development of the public procurement law in the Czech and Slovak Republics during the period of 2001-2005. We try to identify how the changes in the law could have affected the transparency of public tenders and if there exist legal ways of contract allocation without any public tender.

In the second part we develop three indicators in order to measure the transparency of the public procurement market. The first indicator describes how many percent of the overall public procurement market is allocated through open tenders. The second indicator shows how many percent of the overall public procurement expenditures are allocated through so-called “small” contracts, i.e. contracts which are not directly specified by the law and which have a character of a “free hand” choice. The last indicator deals with international transparency and shows how many percent of the overall public procurement expenditures are advertised in the EC Journal.

Within the third part we calculate the previously defined indicators for the Czech and Slovak Republics for the period 2001-2005. Preliminary results indicate that the situation in the sphere of transparency is not good. Through open contracts is allocated only one third of the overall volume of public procurement expenditures. Much more frequent are “small” contracts. We can also find significant differences between the Czech and Slovak Republics. This is a result of different national laws.

The last part provides synthetic conclusions. We analyse the main reasons for the low degree of transparency in the procurement systems of the Czech and Slovak Republics and suggest several measures of how to improve them.

Key Words: Czech and Slovak Republics; Effectiveness; Public Expenditures; Public Procurement; Transparency