The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  15th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
IV. Working Group on Democratic Governance of Multiethnic...
Author(s)  Agnes Horvath 
  University of Tokaj
Sarospatak  Hungary
Marianna Dobó 
 
 Title  The importance of education at the work of minority local governance
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Establishing the minority local governance in Hungary was an important milestone of the democratic regime change of 1989. Following the minority law of 1993 the first elections of local minority governments in Hungary were in 1994. In the more than one decade that has past since then several areas of the minority corporations’ work have been disapproved, many times questioning even the foundation of their working.
I wish to study the functioning of the minority local governments by their aspects of decision making in my presentation.
Around 150 minority local governments in Northern-Hungary were studied with questionnaires during a study done in 2005. The starting-point of the research was the approaches to find out what kind of decision making process do the minority local governments, which are considered the capital area of enforcing minority interests, have.
Major fields of question:
A) How do the different ethnic minority local governments rule, what are the steps and who take part in it? Within this examining the existence of thematic decision proposals and if so then how does it happen: who determines the decision process’ problems?
Are there conflicts inside the ethnic local governments and does this show up between the local governments and the majority society?
B) How is the communication of the ethnic minority governments’ decisions accomplished? Is it possible to find in it standards typical of the ethnic groups? Closely related to this are the characteristics of the minority elite and their connections with other official groups like Lungo Drom, MCF etc.
C) An important part of the study is the one presenting the limits or the traps of the minority ruling that can block the efficient decision making, the co-operation within the minority and among the minority and the majority.


I wish to present during the analysis the social milieu, too, in which the minority local governments operate. With the help of earlier researches I wish to reveal in the present sample too (including not only gipsy minority local governments) the scores of the power dominance make felt by local government units. This phenomenon is one of the possible obstacles to even chances among organizations.
The facilities of a change, which make even chances available, are:
• Trainings: short, professional trainings about local governmental methods, its requirements and facilities
• Creating and enhancing motivation: both in human resource and financial fields
• Using mediators and facilitators when detecting difficulties of decision making
• Efficiently applying various techniques (negotiation technique, reasoning technique, conflict management, team and group building etc.)
In the course of the research we measured the knowledge of these techniques and the willingness to use them too.