The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  15th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
General Session
Author(s)  Gabor Kovacs 
  Szechenyi Istvan University
Gyor  Hungary
 
 
 Title  Financing local governments in Hungary by issuing municipal bonds: experiences and future prospects
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Abstract
The transition to a market economy in Hungary began at the end of the 1980s. The municipal sector has been operating under new circumstances with respect to both legal and economic regulations since 1990-91. Although the most important steps of the transition have already been completed, the evolution of the municipalities cannot be regarded as fully accomplished. Due to the decentralization process – launched in 1990 – local government revenues decreased significantly in the last decade in real value, while the level and scope of services provided did not decrease at the same time. With help of issuing municipal bonds – as a special financial technique of borrowing – absorption capacity of local governments could be improved.
The regulatory framework of borrowing activity of local governments in Hungary can be regarded as quite liberal and in my opinion the central regulation created favourable conditions for the issuance of municipal bonds. Concerning the potential demand side of municipal securities there is a cumulative interest of banks and other institutional investors in bonds. The major problems occur on the supply side of municipal bonds. Local governments have a wrong impression about bonds and in general they are not aware of the economical and financial attributes of the securities. Borrowing usually is regarded only as the final way for financing and bonds are considered only as bank loans in disguise.
The objective of the paper is to present and analyse the main characteristics of Hungarian local govern-ment’s bond financing and to assess and judge the applicability in Hungary of the bond as a local government fundraising tool reflecting the experience of the studied issues. The sample being studied includes all the Hungarian bond issues between 2002 and 2006. The observation and the investigation have been executed primarily with the aid of personal interviews. The interviewed people are all the employees – generally at managerial posi-tion – of the given local government and issuer who were directly involved into the procedure of the issue.