The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  15th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
Panel on Human Resources Management (HRM) in a Modern Public
Author(s)  Roman Kiflyuk 
  The National Television and Radio Broadcasting Council of Ukraine
Kyiv  Ukraine
 
 
 Title  The performance measurement in community property administration in Ukraine
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Local government is situated close to the citizens and represents the authority of the state. It executes on behalf of state authority tasks to satisfy local community. So, it’s very important for local government to work as efficiently as possible. One element of efficiency in local government depends upon the quality of community property administration.
This is especially important for new independent states as Ukraine is. The issue of budget incomes increasing is very important as for new independent states, so for other countries also. And execution of own responsibilities in the most efficient way is one of the basic issues for local government of every state.
It is not a secret that better self financing will give grater independence to local authority from to the organs of central power. So, for today it is a timely issue to manage efficiently community property.
The use of performance measures in local government is being driven by increased citizen demands for government accountability, greater interest on the part of local legislators in performance related information to assist in program evaluation and resource allocation decisions, and the efforts of various organizations and professional associations to make governments more results-oriented.
Performance measurement allows policy makers, managers, and citizens to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of government services. Performance measures include inputs (resources used), outputs (program activities), efficiency measures (ratio of inputs to outputs), and outcomes (the actual results of programs and services). Many performance measurement systems are limited to measuring program inputs and outputs. Ideally, however, performance measurement efforts will also generate information about program results and outcomes.
So, for creation the efficient system of community property administration, it is necessary to create the following chain: to set the criteria of evaluation, to settle the conflict of interests and provide the high-quality evaluation of the executed work.
To be specific to the topic “efficiency of community property administration” we also can propose that it is “economic benefit plus will of community”.
We can formulate efficient system of local government where we have local authority with resources on entrance, local authority provides qualitative services, and as a result we have satisfied citizens.