The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  15th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
I. Working Group on Politico-Administrative Relations
Author(s)  Jako Salla 
  Tallinn University
Tallinn  Estonia
Olju Moonika, Ms. Moonika Olju  
 
 Title  Politico-administrative relations in the policy making process. The case of the1995 Government of the Republic Act
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Abstract
Authors and institution: Ms. Moonika Olju (Tallinn University) & Mr. Jako Salla (Tallinn University/Ministry of Justice)
Title: Politico-administrative relations in the policy making process. The case of the 1995 Government of the Republic Act

The aim of the research is to discover the possible configurations of politico-administrative relations in the policy making process. In order to do so the preparation of the 1995 Government of the Republic Act is analyzed as an example during the period of 1992-1995. The main motive of the research is to discover configurations of politico-administrative relations that emerged during the preparation of this important legislative act. In the context of administering the summit this research proposed here focuses more deeply on processes.

Because the aim is to generalize analytically, the inductive research is method used. The theoretical part is constructed on theories developed by Guy Peters; Aberbach et al. The research strategy is divided into two parts: the first part is dedicated to finding and describing regularities in the policy making process and in the second part the authors analyze whether the theoretical models of B.G. Peters enable to explain the policy making process at hand. For the purposes of research a qualitative secondary analyses was conducted; the data base is built on archive materials.

The empirical data was collected in the scope of the Estonian Science Foundation project, “The management and analysis of the institutional arrangement of Estonian public administration reforms.” In order to fully comprehend what took place during that period, one unstandardized interview was conducted with one of the key-persons form the process.
The period of interest is divided into 4 parts, 3 different governments were on power during the period. Authors found five important types of actors who, depending on the period, more or less influenced the policy making process and the outcomes: politicians, secretary-general, experts, senior civil servants, other actors. Main institutions that took part from the process were: government office, parliament commission, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Interior.

The analysis revealed that besides politicians and civil servants, experts and other actors participate in the policy making process in a considerable manner. Also four different policy making configurations were discovered and the analysis enables to conclude, that out of five ideal models of B.G.Peters only the administrative state model explained adequately the policy making process.

September 2006.