The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  15th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
V. Working Group on Public Sector Finance and Accounting
Author(s)  Nadezhda Bobcheva 
  Oborishte DIstrict (Part of Sofia Greater Municipality)
Sofia  Bulgaria
 
 
 Title  Land management or land tax: what is pertinent to Bulgarian municipalities?
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
1. Background
Over the last 10 years, in Bulgaria, substantial amounts of real estate and land have been transferred from the central government to the local authorities.

Given the severe economic crisis in Bulgaria during the 90’s, coupled with substantial increase of unemployment rate and cease of industrial activities, as a general rule municipal leadership has considered local economic development a task of the highest priority. The explicitly defined goals for city development focus on physical development. This calls for active policy in all fields, including land management. A number of project for hard infrastructure have been undertaken. Oftentimes, physical development entails acquisition of plots of land both agricultural and urban. In such a way the functioning of the land market is vitally important.

The land reform, which started in 1992, has been almost completed in Bulgaria by the late 90’s. As a result variety of landowners has emerged – citizens, private companies, co-operatives, municipalities, the national government, and other public authorities. Practically, the land plots were highly fragmented. Local government was confronted with a big challenge – how to unite many small pieces of land in possession of diverse owners, given the fact that year 2000 is considered the year when the land market started functioning actively.

Obviously, land is an important tool for economic development closely linked to the concept of "land bank" - to acquire and purchase vacant and underutilised property with the future goal of productive reuse of the land. However, creation of a land bank requires financial resources that have to be budgeted for a particular year. Long-term development perspective entails substantial investment in land plots.

Land can be also an income generating assets – it can be sold or rented. Revenues accrue directly to the municipal budget. Here the trade-off is between holding the land or selling it out, i.e. to choose between a constant financial string or a one-off revenues. Still, in Bulgaria there is no tax on land. However, the discussion about introducing it is on-going and it is important to examine all policy aspect of such a decision.

The contradictory nature of land faces local governments with a huge challenge – how and which land to acquire, how to dispose it, and how to find its best use in order to achieve optimal local development given the current scarcity of resources.

2. Expected outcomes
The proposed research will give insights into:
•Overall development - to portray the land market development in Bulgaria and to highlight the expected future trends;
•Strategy – to what extent the land management linked to the strategic municipal development plan;
•The importance of land revenues to municipal budget – the percentage of revenues generated from land in the total budget and its dynamic;
•Feasibility of introducing a tax on land – how to determine the tax base, the tax rate, and whether tax on land should be local.

3. Methodology
This study will use a number of different methodologies, building upon a range of primary and secondary sources. Three in-depth case studies will be undertaken; the selected municipalities are to be decided.

The primary data will be collected using site visits and semi-structured interviews with key informants and municipal employees. The secondary data includes a content analysis – a review of a number of documents (published summaries, prepared to inform citizens and unpublished data, collected by municipal employees for policy purposes).