The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  15th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
IV. Working Group on Democratic Governance of Multiethnic...
Author(s)  Mihaela Pacesila 
  Bucharest University of Economic Studies
Bucharest  Romania
 
 
 Title  Particularities and trends of urban planning in Romania
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Urban planning began together with the urban revolution, and this last occurred as a consequence of the industrial revolution. It was the result and the vector of the social changes which accelerated at the end of the nineteenth century. But nowadays, our society is subject to new and significant changes, leading to a new urban revolution. Thus, modern urban planning, coming from the previous urban revolution, is no more appropriate In some countries major changes in urban planning already occurred. Thus, the analysis, design, execution and town management methods began to be modified. However, the fundamental problem is represented by the ability to act in this new context that is to provide a margin for choices and actions.
The process of planning and urban modernization cannot be done unconsciously or at random, but consciously and organized. Along with the multiplication of the problems related to the urban life, the conscious processes of city modeling are evolving. As a consequence, the role of specialists in this field increases. Urban modernization implies at the same extent restructuring, reconstruction, renovation, arrangement, etc.
As regards Romania, at present urban planning is guided more by political and economical interests, and less by the interests of the members of the respective communities, and the applicable urban norms. The process of urban planning shows numerous deficiencies which I identified in my paper by the SWOT analysis. The existing legislation regarding urban planning is still oriented onto the physical/layout aspects and not onto the economic and social aspects of the cities. Although much is told about strategic planning, this has not found a legal formulation, neither an administrative procedure of implementation to reflect the competition between the cities. Also, the city is more a matter of object design than of economic development or politic commitment, and the prize competitions of architecture or ”declarative” urbanism studies have not an economic or social basis.
Based on the identified deficiencies in the urban planning process in Romania, I presented several proposals of improvement of this process. The most important refers to the fact that urban planning in Romania should become social planning, and the traditional planning concepts, related to the physical environment should be abandoned. This measure is necessary because the individuals are not the same, and there are different life styles, purposes and problems depending on age and social status.