The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  15th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
VI. Working Group on E-government
Author(s)  Evghenii Stirin 
  Higher School of Economics
Moscow  Russian Federation
 
 
 Title  The peculiarities of interaction between federal and regional level authorities in administrating electronic government in Russia
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Russia’s response to building global information society was reflected in State Federal Program “Electronic Russia” which can be considered as a main tool for Russian Federal Government in solving complex problems of country’s informatization. To manage effectively e-government processes in Russia means to build integrated information resources available not only on federal but also on regional and municipal levels of governance. The basic idea of this article is to underline the key role of Russian regions in forming the common model of electronic interaction among different level authorities. During the sociological research based on interview with public servants responsible for regional informatization in eight regions in which the author also took part it became possible to form a classification containing the three models of regional e-government in Russia. These are:
•Partial or weak informatization
•Chaotic, nonsystematic or extensive informatization
•Manageable, systematic or transforming informatization.
Each of the above mentioned models comprises such crucial for regional e-government development factors as: leadership, management authorities’ structure, interaction with civil society and business community, social capital, the quality of e-government strategy, economical indicators of a region.
For federal center in Russia it will be necessary to pay attention to the way in which the collaboration with regional authorities in forming the national e-government architecture, scaling the typical IT-projects (such as electronic document management systems, geographical information systems, digital signature infrastructure, e-services portals, e.t.c.) can be built due to the high degree of asymmetry in regional economic and social development.
The success in e-government development in Russia lies in the area of enabling more freedom to regional authorities’ e-initiatives and projects.
In each of eight regions analyzed the crucial factor of e-government success or failure could be outlined. It turns out that social capital may be as important as the role of regional leader and the size of the e-government budget doesn’t bring the region to the immediate success due to the managerial problems in administrating public IT-projects.