The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  14th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
III. Working Group on Strategic Leadership in Central Gov...
Author(s)  Polya Katsamunska 
  University of National and World Economy
Sofia  Bulgaria
Pavlov Pavel,  
 
 Title  Capacity for policy implementation in the central government of Bulgaria
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
Traditionally, policy making is considered to be the responsibility of political leaders, while translation of political decisions and their implementation is the key function of administration. Policy formulation and implementation require extensive resources, diverse tools and mechanisms for coordination as they are considered to be phases of the same process (Parsons, 1995), but the two key prerequisites for this process are stabilization and institutional consolidation.
The experience of CEE countries shows that in the period of transition the capacity for policy formulation and implementation has turned out to be a crucial factor for the transformation of the country and to facilitate this process solid institutional arrangements, not only capacity for political leadership, are strongly required.
The review of the Bulgarian development after 15 years of reforms in various sectors (economic, military, social, administrative, etc.), shows that the expertise and managerial experience gathered at the political level do not always lead to better performance. After years of purposeful reforms, the Bulgarian government has not yet acquired the necessary capacity for good policy implementation, which is evident from the regular reports of the European commission on administrative capacity and the evaluations of other outside observers and donors.
The paper provides an overview on the capacity for policy implementation of the Bulgarian government and the objective of the paper is to analyze the role and functions the strategic center (the Council of Ministers and its administration) and the mechanisms of interministrial coordination and harmonization.
The focus of analysis is placed on the current coalition government and changes in the political leadership after the parliamentary elections of June, 2005 in Bulgaria. The study looks at two stages of analysis. First, it examines the composition of the new government, the key actors and their competition. Changes in the structure of the central executive bodies are outlined and the format of the current government is compared to the one of 2001. The distribution of political posts in the ministries among coalition partners is presented. The role of the prime minister and the functions of the political cabinet are discussed.
Next, the organization and efficiency of administrative structures that operate under the Council of Ministers and subordinated to Ministers are analyzed. The mechanisms of interministrial coordination are revealed and the prevailing methods of interministrial coordination and harmonization with other interested parties in the central administration are discussed (bilateral cooperation agreements, consultative and coordinating councils and interministrial working groups). Examples are given and the tendency to set up councils for coordinating and implementing interdepartmental policies at the Council of Ministers is pointed out.
The study is based on an extensive review of normative documents regulating the structure and operation of government institution. Other sources of data are the legal databases of the Council of Ministers (2001-2005) and the Annual reports of the State Administration (2002-2004) that provide information about the organization and efficiency of public administration structures. In addition, the analysis and conclusions are based on findings from personal observations and interviews with members of parliament, governmental officials and civil servants in different level of state administration.