The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  14th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
IX. Working Group on Integrity in Public Governance
Author(s)  Jelena Jerinic 
  Union University
Novi Beograd  Serbia
Jelena Jerinic, LL.M. 
 
 Title  First steps in implementation of codes of conduct for local government officials in Serbia
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter 
Abstract  
  
The paper will lean on and build upon the findings of the paper “Development of codes of conduct for local government officials in Serbia: A beginner’s case”, which the author presented during the 2005 EGPA Annual Conference in Bern in September 2005, within the Study Group on Ethics and Integrity of Governance (the paper is available at http://www.egpa2005.com).

At this moment 140 local assemblies - councils (out of 167) have adopted codes of conduct, applicable to all local “functionaries”, i.e. all elected and appointed local officials. Serbian local codes are unique in the sense that they include a wider circle of officials to whom the codes should apply. In other words, the codes analysed here apply to local elected representatives (local councillors and mayors), members of local boards (executive bodies headed by the mayor), heads of local administrations as well as managers of local public enterprises and institutions. In other words, it applies to all persons other than local administration employees.

The codes adopted in towns and municipalities stem from a Model Code developed by the Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities, the local government association, where the author is presently occupies the position of Advocacy Team Leader.

The paper will attempt to evaluate the first several months of codes’ implementation in Serbian municipalities (most of the codes were adopted in the first six months of 2005). It will mainly look into three aspects – the process of their adoption (final text of the code adopted, the (non)existence and flow of debate in the local assembly; the majority by which the code was adopted); the attitude of local officials towards the code (its fact of its adoption, its significance in general and its contents; existing practice (cases) of implementation. Since the codes are actually a form of self-regulation and lack proper legal sanctions, it will be especially important to analyse the first two aspects - the attitudes of those “regulating themselves”.

The paper will use the results of surveys about to be conducted in several pilot municipalities, within the framework of a project initiated by the Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities and supported by the Westminster Foundation for Democracy. Also, where necessary, additional empirical research on aspects described above will be conducted by the author and the project team.

As the previous paper, this one will also try to provide a comparative perspective, by comparing the Serbian situation to available data from other countries – primarily “post-communist” countries of Central and Eastern, who themselves embarked the process of establishing ethical and integrity standards for local officials.