The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference for PhD students
  Program Overview
The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference for PhD students
Author(s)  Vilma Tubutiene 
  Vilnius University Siauliai Academy
Siauliai  Lithuania
 
 
 Title  Effectiveness of Civil Servant’s Performance Appraisal System: Case of Lithuanian Municipalities
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Vilma Tubutiene
Abstract  
  
Presentation and paper address problems of development of effective public servant’s performance appraisal system. It consists of theoretical and empirical parts. Theoretical section of the publication reveals current state of scientific literature on performance management as main stream of modernization of management of public agencies, presents competing purposes and functions of performance appraisal systems and discuss framework of its effectiveness.

One of the main directions of Public administration reforms in the past decades could be distinguish as elaboration and implementation of result-based or goal-oriented management practices and techniques which could lead to efficiency and accountability of Public officials’ performance. Performance management, as process for improving organizational performance by aligning individual, team and institutional objectives, continues to be an area with growing interest of both - researchers and practitioners in the past decades. The problematic of growing performance orientation in innovative managerial practices in public agencies are embedded and discussed in some specifically designated EC documents – eg. Excellence in Public Administration for Competitiveness in EU Member States (2012), Public Administration Thematic Fiche Quality of Public Administration (2017), EC Toolbox Quality of Public Administration (2017) etc. It is stressed that performance orientation fosters a strategic and performance-based human resource management and allows the administration to perform efficiently while being accountable. Mentioned documents are based on conceptual Performance Management approach, which is widely presented in recent theoretical discourse. Literature determines performance management as a wide variety of activities, policies, procedures and actions designed to help employees to improve their performance. Therefore, performance appraisal is presented as a base point for development of performance management systems, which is focusing on improving individual performance in a consistence with strategic goals of public agency. The research is focused on individual performance appraisal, which, as it is indicated in literature, simultaneously serve multiple, frequently conflicting purposes and functions. This multiple construct raises the question of what combination of exactly purposes and functions constitutes effectiveness of individual performance appraisal and enhancing consistency with strategic goals and with the ultimate aim of improving agency performance.
Presented theoretical model is based on conceptual grouping of purposes and functions of performance appraisal systems. 4 ground purposes (administrative, developmental, strategical and role-based) and 8 functions (goal orientation, judgement, feedback etc.) were distinguished from literature and widely argued in theoretical section.

Empirical section contributes with analysis of recent reforms of Lithuanian Civil Services by applying competency-based model and modernization of Human Resource management function. Results of survey on effectiveness of performance appraisal system in Lithuanian Municipalities are presented and discussed, and conclusions presented.