The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  30th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG1/WG5: Joint Session
Author(s)  Jozef Gasparik 
  Comenius University
Bratislava  Slovakia
Balážová Martina,  
 
 Title  Who participates in Participatory Budgeting? Unravelling of who shows up
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter(s) 
Martina Balážová, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
Abstract  
  
Participatory budgeting often comes to be categorised as one of the most successful instruments when it comes to (as also its name indicates) participation (e.g. Sintomer, 2012). Instrument spread through Latin American continent, following to North America, Asia and Europe, engaging people in decision making and prioritisations on where to allocate public money. It is often being mentioned as travelling innovation (Lehtonen, 2021); policy, traveling from one context to another adapting to local customs. It travelled in a form of comprehensive administrative reforms, as politically neutral device to improve governance (Röcke, 2012) especially when arriving to Europe and CEE region.

Recently it was brought to the light, that PB development in CEE region was undoubtedly different from the original case, and instead of resulting in radical changes to increase activities in favour of marginalised groups it results only in small changes, stagnation even (de Vries et al., 2022). It is ambitious to understand the structure, drivers, and motivation of participants themselves, since the proper data is lacking in majority of cases. Therefor we would like to get deeper inside the topic and analyse these characteristics and structure of participants activated by PB.

This work presents case study of Czech city Brno, where we gathered information consisting of age, gender, education, economic activity, and preferences of all participants for period of four year of its beginning in 2017 till the recent process in action 2021. On this case, we observe and analyse particularities of participants group; not only in static terms of one year period, but also drafting a trend on how the participatory base developed throughout the period of four years. Both desk and field research were employed to gather data and to use relevant qualitative as well as quantitative data for address our research question.