The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  30th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG9: The Rule of Law & Public Administration
Author(s)  Gyorgy Gajduschek 
  Corvinus University of Budapest
Budapest  Hungary
 
 
 Title  Knowledge of law by citizens as a precondition for effective governance. A half-century historical comparison among Hungarian citizens.
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter(s)  Gyorgy Gajduschek
Abstract  
  
“Ignoratia iuris non excusat” is an ancient legal principle stating that, from the point of view of law enforcement (more generally: applying the laws), it is irrelevant if one knows or not the laws she should follow. From the point of view of the social effectiveness of the legal system, this is a highly relevant issue. People cannot – rather: cannot be required to - follow regulations that they are not aware of.
The paper analyses the change of legal knowledge in Hungary from a historical perspective. Relying on questions applied in an empirical study in the mid-sixties we run a representative questionnaire survey some half a century later. Most of the questions probed respondents’ knowledge of hypothetic situations. (E.g. “K. Z. inherits furniture during their marriage. Who owns the furniture?”; or “Is a testamentary valid if it is handwritten but no witnesses sign it?” Altogether 19 questions.)
We examined two main issues: First, how has legal knowledge (measured in this way) has changed in the past five decades, a period including the collapse of communism? We investigate the issue generally but also separately in various legal fields (civil, criminal, public law; 6-6 questions, and the procedural legal questions were also included). Second, what are the factors influencing the level of knowledge, and how has that changed during the past half-century. Most of all we consider the role of age, gender, education level, type of settlement (village, town, city), social stratification. We also reflect on the relative historical change in the role of influencing factors.
We concluded that (a) the level of legal knowledge has highly increased. However, (b) this is due mainly to the increase in overall education level. (c) The only exception is public law, especially constitutional law, where the knowledge increase is much higher than in other legal fields.