The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  29th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
PhD Pre-conference Seminar
Author(s)  Barbara Purkart 
  University of Ljubljana
Ljubljana  Slovenia
Janez Stare, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Public Administration, Ljubljana, Slovenia 
 
 Title  Evaluation of institutional care for the elderly in the Republic of Slovenia in crisis conditions related to the covid – 19 pandemics
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Barbara Purkart
Abstract  
  
An important field in public administration science is a study of complex problems which arise from the praxis. In the last year and a half, we have all been involved and affected by covid – 19 pandemics and its consequences on our life and work. In specific, the field of public service, institutional care for the elderly, which, in Slovenia, is organized as a net of services provided by the state. We are interested in how the organization of work in crisis conditions was handled despite different limitations and obstacles. Through a sociological outline of the risk society, which we live in, we will present the prevalence of the state of emergency and define it through a philosophical-historical perspective. Emergencies are rarely declared and are expected to last as short as possible. However, they are always associated with restrictions of freedom and rights of the most vulnerable groups in particular. Overview of the research work done on our topics shows, that there are four main groups of research work related to the topics. The topics in question are research work on the field related to the covid – 19 pandemics and the elderly, research work done on the field of institutional care for elderly, research of organization of work in crisis conditions in the public sector and research of operation of public services in crisis conditions. With our investigation we would like to examine how and in which way it is possible to improve the preparedness of performers of institutional care for the elderly for further crisis conditions which will arise in future. We will touch upon crisis management protocols, crisis preparedness, crisis staffing plans and crisis communication plans. Our main research question is in what way and with what results did actors of institutional care for elderly in Slovenia organize their work in crisis conditions related to the covid – 19 pandemics and what the opportunities for improvement are. Research questions in our investigations are: To what extent were actors of institutional care for the elderly in Slovenia prepared for the crisis conditions related to the covid – 19 pandemics? As the research method we will use the analysis of legal and institutional support. What do Slovenian results say in comparison to other EU countries. Where are the biggest deviations, what was organized better and what less than average? We will use the analysis of secondary data and the comparison analysis method. How is the organization of work in crisis conditions evaluated by employees in institutional care for the elderly? Is assessment different among different work groups? Where do employees see the shortcomings and mistakes? We will perform a survey among employees in all Slovenian institutional care for the elderly providers and later for conformation or explanation of results, we will also perform the qualitative survey on two focus groups, with representatives of management teams and representatives of other work groups. What kind of guidelines and recommendations in regards to previous research questions, can we provide in order to optimally organize the implementation of institutional care for the elderly for a future crisis? We will propose a model of evaluation of institutional care in crisis conditions. The dissertation will also contribute to the better understanding of differences in the results of the organization of work in the institutional care for the elderly in crisis situations related to the covid-19 pandemic in Slovenia and globally. In praxis the dissertation will contribute to better planning and implementation of the organization of work in crisis situations in institutional care for the elderly in Slovenia.