The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  29th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG6: Evidence-Based Public Policy Making (Physical)
Author(s)  Justyna Wasil 
  Maria Curie-Sklodowska University
Lublin  Poland
 Title  The consequences of strengthening the political position of municipal council in Poland following changes in local government law introduced in 2018
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Justyna Wasil
The consequences of strengthening the political position of municipal council in Poland following changes in local government law introduced in 2018

The system and organization of territorial self-government, both in Poland and in other countries (both the West-Anglo-Saxon model, and the North-Scandinavian model) is subject to constant transformation. The idea of direct election of representatives in the basic units of territorial self-government (municipalities) first appeared in the countries of Western Europe at the turn of the 18th and 19th centuries. The presidential model in the local government was introduced in several Central and Southern European countries (Slovenia, Romania, Italy, Greece), including Poland (in 2002). In our country, this change was aimed at strengthening the legitimacy of the mayor's authority (municipality administrator, mayor, president of the city), safeguarding actual and decisive influence on the creation of local politics, as well as reducing dependence on the council. The 2002 reformers assumed the cooperation of these bodies and their mutual balancing. Meanwhile, the phenomenon of cohabitation became the principle of coexistence of both bodies in municipalities/cities, where the head of municipality (municipality administrator, mayor, city president) represents a different political option than the majority in the council. As research demonstrates, these are not rare cases, because half of the municipal governments after the 2010 and 2014 elections were affected by the phenomenon of cohabitation, including permanent conflict. Balancing authorities in a conflict brings negative effects in the functional layer, hinders the effective decision-making process, and sometimes leads to paralysis of authorities, which using their powers and tools hinder the mutual functioning:
First: it is the introduction of an obligatory committee of complaints, proposals and petitions.
Second: introducing the obligation to submit a report on the condition of the municipality by its head (municipality administrator, mayor, president of the city) by the end of May each year.
Thirdly: the granting of additional competences
By applying the institutional and legal method, the position of municipal bodies in the legal system will be clarified, and how the newly adopted regulations, especially the tools introduced by the amendment of the local government law from the term 2018-2023, affect the systemic and actual strengthening of the council.
The comparative method, will be important, among others in comparison of the previously regulated systemic position of the council to the current one, i.e. from the beginning of the term 2018-2023; comparing the practice of using new tools in municipal self-governments free of cohabitation and those subject to it, especially in its conflict form. The basis for inference in the content analysis is the content of the message, e.g. articles from local newspapers, records (minutes, recordings) of meetings of municipal/city authorities. This method will be useful to demonstrate the practice of using new tools.
Using the decision method, the decision processes will be determined in the analyzed municipalities, and how the new tools and powers granted to the council, added to the self-government system in 2018, influence this process.