The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  29th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
Panel: Politico-Administrative Relations in CEE (Physical)
Author(s)  Anamarija Musa 
  University of Zagreb
ZAGREB  Croatia
Dzinic Jasmina,  
 
 Title  Till’ death do us part: the government advisory bodies in Croatia
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Anamarija Musa
Abstract  
  
The advisory bodies in central government have long served as permanent or temporary hubs of expert and scientific knowledge created to support governmental decisions and policy making. The networks of government and external experts with specialised know-how have multiple roles - they present scientific advice which enables evidence-based policy; they serve as a connection between the government and policy stakeholders floating between politics and expertise; and they are important actors in the overall regulation process, with certain level of impact on final regulatory choices. The issues arising in relation to advisory bodies pertain to their roles, coordination and composition, selection and appointment, transparency, ethics and integrity, etc.
The advisory bodies have long been present in Croatian policy making but their role and functioning has not been researched. The spread of strategic steering, the emergence of wicked problems, as well as the need to support the policy decisions with expert advice as a response to eroded trust in government, have given the additional incentive for creation of such bodies. This process is visible both at the level of Government (and offices in the centre of government), as well as at the ministerial level, in the specific policy areas. In this pioneering research for Croatian policy advice research the paper is focused on mapping the advisory bodies in Croatian government and analysing their main features. The research methods include desk research and legal analysis.