The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference for PhD students
  Program Overview
The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference for PhD students
Author(s)  Eduards Lielpeters 
  University of Latvia
Riga  Latvia
 
 
 Title  Fostering citizen participation: communication of Latvian ministries on Facebook
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Eduards Lielpeters
Abstract  
  
In a democracy, it is important that citizens have access to information about the activities of the institutions, as well as they have various opportunities for participation in the decision-making process of public administration. In Latvia relations between public administration and society is fragile. In the decision-making process important role in Latvia is given to non-governmental organisations that are acting as representatives of citizens in advisory bodies and also in other ways are providing their knowledge to public administration. At the same time, only around 5% of Latvian citizens are members of non-governmental organisations. Thus, in reality, just a small part of the population is participating in the decision-making process. At the same time, only 32% of citizens trust in public administration and often decisions made by institutions are questioned by society and mass media in Latvia. There is a need to foster citizen participation and also their trust in public administration. As a contemporary solution to this problem could be a more thoughtful activity of public administration on the digital environment - to develop closer relations between institutions and citizens, as well as, to provide digital participation opportunities also to those citizens who are not members of non-governmental organizations, hence silent majority of Latvian society.
To understand the current situation in Latvia and gather data that could be used to improve relations between public administration and citizens, there is implemented content analysis of Facebook pages maintained by Latvian Ministries. Ministries are selected for the content analysis as they are already obligated to provide opportunities for citizen participation in the decision-making process. And the content of Facebook pages is analysed because this social media is used by all ministries and it is most often used social media in Latvia. In the study is analysed the main Facebook pages of all 13 Latvian ministries in the six months period – from July 2019 until December 2019. In this period all ministries together have published 3181 entries that are analysed according to three groups of indicators: content indicators, message indicators and feedback indicators (overall 13 main indicators that are composed of more than 60 sub-indicators).
Results of the study are demonstrating that for now institutions have various and noticeably different habits in the use of digital opportunities that social media are offering for content creation, network building and two-way communication. Ministries have various communication styles - in nine Facebook accounts educational entries are published slightly more often than informative entries, however, the proportions of educational posts vary between ministries, as well as engaging posts are still a minority. As the biggest drawback was recognised that in the analysed period there were only 4% social media posts that are about citizen participation opportunities or decisions made with the participation of citizens or their representatives, thus continuing to maintain the comprehension that decision-making process is mostly happening behind closed doors.
Considering the results of the study there is proposed digital participation strategy for public administration institutions. Implementation of strategy could help to combine good practices that are already used by some of the ministries and help to foster two-way dialogue with society, also strengthening citizens participation in the decision-making process.