The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference for PhD students
  Program Overview
The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference for PhD students
Author(s)  Stanislaw Zakroczymski 
  University of Warsaw
Warsaw  Poland
 
 
 Title  Is Re-centralization happening? The Practice of Supervision of Local Authorities in Poland
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Stanislaw Zakroczymski
Abstract  
  
In Polish legal doctrine and political science, the phenomenon of growing pressure of the central government on the local governments is being noticed. Such factors as the growing financial dependence of LGs on the central budget, transfer of the LG powers to the central government or overregulating the LG tasks have been described. This paper deals with another problem concerning this phenomenon, i.e. the growing supervisory activity of voivodes –regional representatives of central government over the local governments.
According to Polish Local Governments Acts, voivode, nominated by the Prime Minister and responsible for the representation of the central government in the region, is entitled to repeal any legal or quasi-legal act of local authorities if he finds it illegal (in terms of compliance with state law). Moreover, in some specific cases, voievode has the right to issue the Replacement Orders if the Local Government fails to issue the act to which it is obliged. Both described competences are quite strong interference in the sphere of autonomy of LG in comparison to the other countries of region.
In the paper I would like to describe the rise in the supervisory activity of voivodes. As my research has shown, while in 2014 the voievodes issued 1849 supervisory decisions in whole country, in 2019 this number amounted to 2907 (growth by 64%). What is significant, at the same time, the Regional Audit Chambers, independent authorities responsible for the supervision of the financial acts of LGs issued about 1500 to 1600 Supervisory Decisions each year. Moreover, the number of LG’s complaints lodged with the RAC against the voievodes supervisory rulings grew from 248 in 2014 to 384 in 2018 and the success rate of such complaints increased from 18,2% in 2014 to 51,0% in 2018. In the meantime the analogical success rate in the cases against the decisions by the RAC dropped. In some regions the number of Supervisory Decisions and Replacement Orders of voievodes grew even threefold or fourfold. This may indicate that the supervisory policy of voivedes dramatically changed.
I would like to pay particular attention to the problem of Replacement Orders of voivedes concerning the de-communization of the names of streets, squares and other public venues under the Decommunization Act. This Act allowed the representatives of government to change such names if they found that the previous ones ‘commemorate people, organizations, events or dates symbolizing communism or another totalitarian system, or promote such a system in any other way.’ This regulation is very far-reaching interference with the crucial competence of LGs – i.e. the power to shape the local symbolic and identity policy. What is more, the criteria of this interferences set by the abovementioned law are very vague and create a temptation for the voievodes to over interpretate their powers. Actually, it happened. My research has shown that the voivodes issued 535 Replacement Orders concerning the names of public venues. 23% of them were questioned by the LGs befor the administrative courts. The success rate of LG in such procedures amounted to 86%. This shows the extent to which the government representatives abuse their supervisory powers in order to impose their will on the independent LGs.
In my paper I would like to show the in-depth legal and political analysis of this phenomenon of growing supervisory pressure on LGs and draw the possibilities of changing the law and legal practice in order to prevent such phenomenon in the future.