The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Excellent conference. I really enjoyed the papers, speakers, schedule and location and great staff!

D.B., United States, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...relating to public administration and policy. Good opportunities for networking.

N.D., Georgia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

Excellent participants, argument-driven discussions, impartial and supportive Chairs in the Working Group.

D.G., Republic of North Macedonia, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...to detail and I really enjoyed the supportive and encouraging atmosphere there. Thank you!

R.B., Lithuania, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...both in terms of academic quality and logistics, and also social events. It was a true joy.

E.Z., Bulgaria, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...The special programmes were really excellent and we took home many varied experiences.

P.N., Hungary, 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2019, Prague

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference for PhD students
  Program Overview
The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference for PhD students
Author(s)  Ivan Makarov 
  Higher School of Economics
Moscow  Russian Federation
 
 
 Title  Aggregation of Intercorrelated International Indices of Public Administration Effectiveness
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Ivan Makarov
Abstract  
  
Socio-economic indices are an increasingly popular type of analytical tools in social sciences. They are capable of representing complex social phenomena as relatively simple quantitative variables, which enables researchers to apply many methods of quantitative and comparative analysis to studies in various areas, including public administration. Index-based evaluation of public administration effectiveness is widely used by scholars, administrators, policymakers and private managers alike, and there exist numerous indices designed for this purpose. However, relatively few studies have examined the effectiveness and possible shortcomings of the indices used. One such shortcoming highlighted by previous research is that the values of some indices are strongly statistically correlated with each other, possibly to the point where the indices are statistical duplicates of each other. This may make them inefficient or misleading as analytical tools, due to users not taking the correlations into account when utilizing multiple correlated indices.
This study considers two popular sets of international indices of public administration effectiveness – namely Worldwide Governance Indicators and Doing Business indices – and their own effectiveness as analytical tools. The goal of the study is to determine whether these indices are subject to the described limitation of strong intercorrelation, and to explore how this limitation can be overcame if present. It is suggested that it may be possible to accomplish that with the use of principal component analysis. This method may allow to transform the studied base indices into aggregate indices, reducing the number of variables and removing the correlations between indices without significant loss of useful information contained in the indices.
To achieve the goals set, correlation analysis and principal component analysis are carried out on the values of the Worldwide Governance Indicators and the Doing Business indices for all available countries, utilizing the datasets downloaded from World Bank’s official site. The preliminary results show strong positive correlations between the Worldwide Governance Indicators and moderate positive correlations between the Doing Business indices. It is likely that principal component analysis will be able to yield more effective indices by removing these correlations. It is expected that the efficiency of aggregation using principal component analysis will depend on the strength of correlations between aggregated indices. The results of this study may have important implications for all users of the analyzed sets of indices. Furthermore, this study is expected to become a basis for a large volume of further research into the field of index-based evaluation of public administration effectiveness, which may have significant impact on public administration worldwide.