The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
WG2: E-government
Author(s)  Peter Mate Erdosi 
  Ludovika University of Public Service
Budapest  Hungary
 
 
 Title  Comparative Analysis and Measurement of Electronic Signatures Created by Notaries in Europe
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Peter Mate Erdosi
Abstract  
  
The eIDAS Regulation established the general acceptance of qualified signatures in the European Union and defines several Implementation Acts to support this goal. These rules are more general and there are numerous attributes of electronic signatures, which are not legislated, therefore several different electronic signatures can be created in legal way. The question arises whether these differences are meaningful or meaningless in case of qualified and non-qualified signatures, and how these differences can be measured. We use the Electronic Signature Dimension Model for the visualization of the distances between different electronic signatures and try to answer this question.
This paper provides a comparative analysis between electronic signatures used by notaries in Romania and in Hungary through examination of relevant dimensions in connection with electronic signatures and defines a potential calculus for the determination of numeric distance between different but real signatures. All knowing technological and legal aspects of electronic signatures are evaluated, which can be derivable from other laws, the practice and literature.
Finally, this paper tries to explain differences, in the other words, the meaning of distances between different electronic signatures and argues the measurement of conditions in accordance with cross-border acceptance of qualified electronic signatures in the European Union.