EAPAA

European Association for Public Administration Accreditation

UNPAN

NISPAcee serves as a regional center of UNPAN www.unpan.org

EVENTS from Other Institutions

  Submit Events

April 17 - April 19, 2024
Performance Audit degli investimenti co-finanziati dal budget UE: l’approccio della Corte dei Conti

April 18 - April 19, 2024
Knowledge Management in Public Sector Organisations

April 23 - April 26, 2024
New Structural Funds Programmes and the New Regulations 2021-2027

May 22 - May 24, 2024
Financial Management and Audit of EU Structural Funds, 2021-2027

May 22 - May 24, 2024
CAF Success Decoded: Leadership Commitment and Agile Management

May 23 - May 28, 2024
Ex-post Regulatory Evaluations

May 23 - May 30, 2024
Regulatory Impact Assessments

June 4 - June 6, 2024
Monitoring and Evaluation of EU Structural and Cohesion Funds programmes, 2021-2027

June 18 - June 19, 2024
Negotiate to Win: Essential Skills for Bilateral Negotiations

June 26 - June 27, 2024
Competitive Dialogue and Negotiated Procedures

  view more...

Other NEWS

Central European Public Administration Review accepted for inclusion in Scopus

Central European Public Administration Review - new issue has been published

Call for applications for Public Sector Innovation and eGovernance MA programme

UNPAN Partners’ Newsletter July – August – September 2023

INVITATION:KosovaPAR2023 Conference on PAR for an Agile and Resilient Governance

DPIDG/DESA and the International Budget Partnership (IBP) Handbook for Auditors

CEPAR new issue Vol 21 No1 (2023)

Call for papers for EGPA 2023 Conference, Zagreb, Croatia, 5-7 September 2023

Freedom House NEW REPORT: Global Freedom Declines for 17th Consecutive Year

Call for PIONEER (Public Sector Innovation and eGovernance) application

WG_News :: About WG :: Coordinators :: Activities :: WG_outputs

Managing local public debt in the countries in transition: An issue of fiscal capacity or somethings Else?

Research Protocol 2006

 

Introduction

 

The main goal of this research is to examine the policy and practice of local public debt and its management. Decentralisation, devolution, delegation, deconcentration and similar actions aimed at bringing government closer to the people, assume that enough public funds are made available to local government bodies and their independent agencies. In order to deliver this local governments are to be given enough resources to be successful in delivering newly acquired services and exercising attracted powers. Usual point of departure is that local government will be given approximately the amount that the central government has spent rendering delegated services. However, with the constant squeeze of the public purse, usually the powers and services are transferred, but this move is not followed by the transfer of corresponding resources. Therefore, local (sub-national) governments are forced to look for other sources of revenue. Usually, they may seek to establish independent local revenue streams, but the problem is that often they need prior approval of the central government before the levies are imposed. Similarly, the local governments often have to seek prior approval before applying for loans or other forms of debt.

 

The public debt limits are usually regulated by law and enforced by the central bank, which monitors the national level of indebtedness, acting as a government agent, especially when the debt is with a foreign element. Central governments can in the final instance monetise their debt, but this is not an option for local and other sub-national level governments. They are more treated similarly to private borrowers and they can do default on their debt. Sub-national governments are evaluated by private rating agencies and investors are interested in their standing, as the interest that they will pay will depend not only on inflation, maturing and also on the risk of default associated with a particular class of securities. Although, traditionally the focus in the Western public finance (public financial management) literature has been on attracting funds through the issuance of securities, one should not neglect the classical loans and credits that commercial banks can extend to local governments. In fact, in most developing and transitional economies, this is the most preferred form of municipal debit.

 

Local and sub-national debt is usually marketed nationally. It is very rare that the debt will be offered internationally. If the latter is the case, the prior approval of the government will be sought, and the international investors usually expect that the national government guarantees for debt of sub-national government units. However, even marketing nationally will have an ‘external’ element. Namely, the securities will be most often bought by people who remain outside the jurisdiction of the issuing government. This can be seen as an importation of funds, when the debt is issued and as drainage of the funds when the debt is repaid. The purchasing power will leave the jurisdiction as the investors reside somewhere else. Sub-national level governments must concern themselves with minimising the interest burden on their debt and the risk of default.

 

Long-term financing by sub-national level governments may be justified on the basis of the benefit principle for financing capital projects. As capital expenditures by sub-national level governments, involve the construction of infrastructural objects which will provide a stream of public services to citizens; they will enjoy future benefits. This is the reason why often local government borrowing merits referendum or another form of public consultation and/or approval.

 

 

Structure of the country papers

 

The papers have to be up to 8,000 words long (including references and appendices). Please, try to adhere to the set limit, as this enables preparation of any intended future publication.

 

Prospective authors can opt for one of two possible paper models. They can either discuss the national policy regarding local government debt and its management, or simply decide to focus on one local (sub-national) level government (municipality, region) and analyse their debt management. It is however, expected that national studies will have priority in making the choice of accepted papers.

 

The national papers should have the following structure, whilst case study papers have to address the same/similar issues but within the local context.

 

1. Introduction

 

In the introduction the authors have to clearly set out the goals, aims and objectives of their research, what might be the main issues (research questions) that they plan to tackle and how this is going to be done, with a list of expected outcomes? It is acceptable to discuss very briefly the main problems dealt with in the literature and how this may relate to their research. It is expected that all authors will demonstrate a very good knowledge of related literature in both local language and in English. At the end of the introductory section the author should set out the remaining of the paper (paper structure).

 

2. Broad Institutional Framework: The Government System

 

In this section the authors will present an institutional framework of the country they plan to focus on. The main aspects of political dynamics are to be presented, but should not be overly extensive and burdening the text. Main political events in the post 1989 transition are to be generally mentioned, and only if they are crucial for better understanding of the main issues are they to be explored in more detail. The government structure and organisation of power in the country is to be explored in more detail, presenting and analysing the nature of the relationship between the central and local governments. It is also necessary to stress to what extent the principle of the division of power is followed, and what is the relationship between legislative, executive and judicial powers, and how the mutual checks (if any) are performed. In this section the authors should generally tackle the issue of decentralisation and implicit and explicit relationship between central and local governments. Brief review of fiscal relations can also be given.

 

 

3. Public Debt: The Government Deficit Financing

 

In this section authors are required to present national regulation on debt and debt management, but more within the context of the country as a whole. What is the letter of law when it comes to regulating public debt in a country at both national and sub-national levels? The comparative data for the last 10 years should be provided for both national and sub-national (aggregate) debt. It would also be useful to focus on the structure of debt (maturity, origin, form, etc.).

 

Authors should focus here on the national debt policy. What is the government stance regarding public borrowings and what is the public attitude towards public indebtedness. All the borrowings must be repaid in the future and it is the commitment of today for the future generations. So, to what extent the public supports the polity of inter-generational solidarity? Debt servicing costs can impair the ability of the borrower to function normally, and therefore the government has to be very careful before committing its fund in the future. The basic rule of financial management is not to mismatch the funds and the uses, or in other words, the debt should not be issued for a longer than the useful life of the project for whose financing it was raised.

 

Word Bank and other international financial institutions are promoting participatory commitment. Namely, in order to attract Bank’s funding they now expect that people will support the move. In that sense they believe that the public commitment is more valuable then commitment of the government of the day. Governments change, but the public sentiment should have a longer life. So, it would be useful to consider to what extent public consultations are used in the process of deciding to issue debt.

 

The authors in this section should put the public debt into the prospective of the overall government financing and analyse for what uses the public debt has been used, and whether it was used for non-productive expenditure uses.

 

 

4. Forms of Local Public Debt

 

In this section the authors should outline the main forms of local (sub-national) government debt. The thorough analysis of loans/credits and their terms is expected, as in many transitional economies this is the most important form of local debt. Within the national framework and international context the authors should discuss issuing securities, what the requirements are, what are the limitations and what has been the practice with local government securities. Particular attention should be paid to the risk management and local government ratings. As local debt is usually traded nationally, it is most unlikely that international ratings are available, so the authors should describe and analyse the national rating policies and practices. Data on the last 10 years, or preferably from 1989 would be welcome with the clear demonstrations of trends. If there were cases of default those are to be outlined and analysed to the extent most possible. If possible, the authors should provide the distribution of local government securities holdings that is what sections of society are in the possession of the securities. Also, it would be good to see to what extent local residents and businesses are in the possession of the same, as this demonstrates their trust in local government.

 

 

5. Debt Classification and Debt Management

 

In this section authors should provide more information on how the debt is rated nationally and what are the factors to be taken into account when the securities are to be issued. Usually, rating agencies in the Western countries stick to four classifications: 1) economic; 2) financial; 3) debt, and 4) administrative. Economic factors are usually, economic based, issuer characteristics, demographics, tax based, employment base, retail sales, comparative criteria, sources of information… Financial criteria usually encompass the quality of accounting and reporting, analysis of accounts, pension and long-term liabilities… Debt factors include type and strength of security pledged, maturity schedule and whether it matches the life of the project being financed, the degree of reliance on short-term debt, and current debt burden and future financing needs. Administrative factors usually revolve around documenting the planning goals, soundness of financial management, annual budget, capital improvement programme, benefit statements, quality of administration, etc.

 

The authors should address the problem of debt management at local level, schedules of payment and matching the obligations and the revenues. Also, it is necessary to analyse the situations when things may go (and usually go) wrong, such as default, repudiation, receivership and bankruptcy. It is important to outline the experience with debt servicing in the last decade or so and whether there were any problems in servicing, as well as whether respective governments offered some form of collateral on the debt.

 

 

6. Conclusion

 

The last section has to sum up all the major issues raised in the paper and to make a clear assessment of the role of the borrowed finance for sub-national governments (local governments) in a respective country. The papers have to be academically strong, but at the same time policy-oriented, offering a credible policy advice. The paper should clearly outline the positive practice in debt management in a respective country with reference to local fiscal capacity to serve debt. In many countries where decentralisation is only a theoretical concept there are many problems with the capacity of local (sub-national) governments to raise additional funds in capital markets.

 

The concluding section is also to point out possible avenues of future research, trying to align the current trends in (Western) literature to the specific developmental experiences of CEE and CIS countries and their national specifics. Based on country study research, authors should take a stance regarding the current debt management practices and what can be done to improve the current situation. Some anecdotal referencing to other (especially neighbouring) transitional countries can be a useful feature of the paper.

 

 

Conclusion

 

The aim of the project looks at the current debt management practices in CEE and fSU countries, with relation to their overall fiscal capacity. However, one cannot look at the debt management outside the context of the overall fiscal capacity and ability of local governments to raise their own revenues. The research should address the problems that have already been experienced in a respective country, whilst the comparative feature of the planned book, may provide more generalised picture. This research is to contribute to on-going debate, analysing the changing patterns in CEE and CIS countries. It is hoped that some regional good practices can be established and that common public policy framework can be offered as a result of large scale comparative research. 

The Working Group on Public Sector Finance and Accounting is supported by a grant from The Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative Open Society Institute, Budapest, Hungary http://lgi.osi.hu/