The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Read more testimonials
 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 
 share

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

VII. Working Group on Public Policy Analysis Development Issues

  

WG Programme Coordinators:

Lesya Ilchenko-Syuyva, Economic Policy Department, National Academy of Public Administration, Office of the President of Ukraine
E-mail:lesya@rocketmail.com
Frans Jorna, Associate Professor of Governance, Centre for Urban and Environmental Development, Enschede, Netherlands
E-mail:f.b.a.jorna@saxion.nl

Due to the theme of the 2014 NISPAcee Annual Conference, the Working Group on Public Policy Analysis Development Issues would like to take the opportunity to focus on the importance of evidence-based policy making that links together the interests of the stakeholders as a basis of good governance. More specifically, we encourage authors to focus on:

 

-Evidence based policy analysis, development and implementation.

-Case studies of the application of techniques (e.g. stakeholder analysis, regulatory impact assessment, ex ante impact assessment, policy evaluation).

-Procedures of policy design and coordination.

-Paths forward and problems in public policy capacity building.

-Public administration in ensuring good governance.

 

In the past few years, more and more comparative papers have been presented and published, so the group collected a rich inventory of cases. As a next step, we invite academics and practitioners, applying with papers, to concentrate on case studies related to policy analysis and policy design and implementation in the above mentioned areas. The papers which are going to be presented within the Working Group should try to provide both a diagnosis and possible remedies for the shortcomings or bottlenecks.

 

The Working Group still remains a forum for academia and practitioners to exchange experience on how academics can meet the urgent needs of public servants in practice-oriented studies in preparing and promoting relevant policy advice, as well as in upgrading academic and training programmes in public policy analysis.