The 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone
Key Papers and Papers
 
 
 
 
The NISPAcee effort is constantly improving the quality of its Annual Conferences in the order to create a space for the presentation of high quality papers. Therefore, since the 21st NISPAcee Annual conference in Belgrade, Serbia in 2013, in the conference programme we started to distinguish the Conference Papers.
 
The paper can be identified by Working Group coordinator(s) as a Key Paper or a Paper based on the quality of the full paper.
 
What means the identification/status "Key Paper"?
  • The paper is in a higher quality and with higher significance for Working Group;
  • Presenter has more time for the presentation on the Conference, 15-30 minutes including discussion (the time frame is set by the WG coordinators);
  • The paper has a greater potential to be published by NISPAcee Press.
 
What means the identification/status "Paper"?
  • The paper is in a standard quality;
  • The time for presentation on the Conference is 5-15 minutes including discussion
  • The author has a chance and opportunity to improve the paper.
 
We do believe that the differentiation between the papers based on their quality and significance will improve the standards of papers presented on the Conference and will be for benefit of all conference participants.