The 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone
VII. Working Group on Public Policy Analysis Development Issues
WG Programme Coordinators:
Lesya Ilchenko-Syuyva,  Economic Policy Department, National Academy of Public Administration, Office of the President of Ukraine
E-mail: lesya@rocketmail.com

Frans Jorna, Associate Professor of Governance, Centre for Urban and Environmental Development, Enschede, Netherlands
E-mail: f.b.a.jorna@saxion.nl




Call for Papers 2013

Topic: "Regionalisation and Inter-Regional Cooperation."


Despite the fact that in recent years there has been asignificant effort to improve decision-making within the public sector by developing capacity in policy analysis in CEE, Central Asia and Caucasus countries, public policy analysis, as the basis for evidence-based policy, is still in its initial stages. Many countries are still heavily reliant on donor assistance and there continues to be issues, both on the demand side (how much governments genuinely want evidence-based policy advice), and on the supply side (e.g. skilled policy analysts within government bureaucracy, teaching institutions, think tanks).


In the light of the main conference theme, the Working Group has decided to tighten its focus and become a vehicle for discussions and debates around capacity challenges to professional policy analysis and concrete remedies for those challenges. Multi-level governance and inter-regional cooperation also further require the capacity for professional policy, e.g. in the area of EU cohesion policies, and thus provide fertile ground for further improvements on these issues.


These are especially important in the regions embraced by NISPAcee. First, policy analysis has developed unevenly in different countries. Cross-country learning is still in its infancy, academic training and its link to the international fora are often weak, and the professional capacity in governments for policy analysis is sometimes severely limited. Can the countries in the targeted region overcome these obstacles and make a great leap forward and if so, how? Second, the Working Group wishes to go beyond diagnosis and encourage discussion on the ways forward, and this practical orientation on public policy analysis makes the Working Group a place for a fruitful meeting and discussion between practitioners and scholars.

In this framework, the contributors’ papers should provide both a diagnosis and possible remedies for the shortcomings or bottlenecks in the capacity for policy analysis, which in turn, might lead to emergent strategies across the regions.
More specifically, papers may focus on:

1. Specific weaknesses/strengths of policy analysis in a single country or region, either generally or in specific sectors;

2. Best practices and typical CEE development issues in the application of policy analysis techniques and methods;

3. Comparative analysis of similar challenges faced by a variety of countries (including an analysis of instances where capacity-building is being attempted)

4. Regional and inter-regional efforts to design and implement evidence-based policies.