The 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

EUFLAG
EUFLAG

...Sessions were interesting, scholars were engaging and all the social events were amazing!

B.K., Kazakhstan, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

Excellent organization, excellent food. Compliments to the organizers, they did a wonderful job!

V.J., Netherlands, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

...I must say that the PhD pre-conference seminar was the most useful seminar of my life. Very well...

K.V., Czech Republic, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

... I would even argue that they are the very best - both in terms of scientific content and also entertainment…

P.W., Denmark, 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018, Iasi

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  27th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
Panel: Public Service Reform in the Post-Soviet Countries
Author(s)  Jahi Jahija 
  Ministry of Information Society and Administration of the Republic of Macedonia
Skopje  Republic of North Macedonia
 
 
 Title  Creating a Top Management Service in Macedonia
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Jahi Jahija
Abstract  
  
Professionalisation of the top management is a key determinant of organisational performance in the public sector. The creation of a Top Management Service (TMS) for the public sector in MK is aimed at strengthening the public service and contributing to the modernization of the state administration and the enhancement of good governance.
According to the “Public Administration Reform Strategy 2018 – 2022”, the Government assumes “Professionalisation of senior management structures – regulation of the clear distinction between the political and professional management level”, as one of the de-politicisation measures. This is to be done by regulating transparent and competitive procedures based on merit for the selection and termination of senior public managers.
Currently, all top management positions of the State hierarchy, such as State Secretary and equivalent positions in public bodies, are not recruited and selected by open competition procedure, instead discreetly appointed by the Government; yet the nature of the job is significantly managerial and committed to the implementation of public policies. These position holders develop professional functions in the upper hierarchy, playing a key double role: advising on the design of public policies and simultaneously linking the civil service with the elected and appointed political authorities.
For these office holders, the present proposal is a new model, the TMS, based on two core values: 1) professionalism, merit selection to ensure competent professionals; 2) political responsiveness, needed to build a functional and trusting relationship between ministers and senior managers.
The model proposed is designed under the principle of two legitimacies or rationalities, democratic and technical. Since the XIX Century, this has laid the foundation for building a professional and neutral administration: the political objectives are fulfilled through the action of public servants under the leadership of a TMS that seeks effectiveness and the best use of resources in pursuit of the objectives laid down by the Government.
The proposal is to create an ambitious system but to develop and implement it progressively and prudently. Ideally, the new TMS positions should be identified in previously “rationalized” ministries and other public bodies. In this sense, a previous functional analysis providing a new organizational chart would be recommended for the ministries and institutions before filling the new TMS positions. In the case of autonomous or semi-autonomous public bodies, the lines of accountability should be defined to ensure clarification of functions and responsibilities of the new TMS positions.

The TMS system is exclusively intended for top or very high positions with clear managerial responsibilities. It is not intended for middle management or operational management positions (heads of the sector are to be probably excluded from the system, at least initially). It is also not to be used for the appointment of governing bodies, management boards and other collegial bodies as those perform governance functions and not executive management1. The positions developing political functions or providing political advice, such as heads of cabinet and advisors, are excluded from the TMS system.