The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  26th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
VI. Public Policy Analysis Development
Author(s)  Katarzyna Szmigiel-Rawska 
  University of Warsaw
Warszawa  Poland
Dabrowska Anna,  
 
 Title  Climate Change Strategies of Polish Regions – What has changed?
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Katarzyna Szmigiel-Rawska
Abstract  
  
One of the main development trends in local government is "Europeanization" of regional policy (Ladrech 1994) understood as the impact of European Union on shaping and implementing policies at national and regional level. This phenomenon can be particularly evident in countries that are heavily "dependent" on EU funds (Swianiewicz 2011). Poland as the largest beneficiary of European Cohesion Policy among other Member States can be therefore a good example. Approximately 67 billion EUR was allocated in Poland, in 2007-2013; the allocation is over 86 billion EUR for the period 2014-2020. Almost 25% of cohesion policy funds (16.5 billion EUR) in the period 2007-2013 was operated by regional authorities, while during the period 2014-2020 this share has increased to 40% (31 billion EUR). As a result, Poland is not only the greatest beneficiary of the EU Cohesion Policy, but also one of the largest “laboratories for regional policy” in the world, having been involved in a continuous process of building a new model of inter- and intra-regional policy since 1999 (Żuber 2008).
At the same time, policy measures aimed at counteracting climate change have been initiated and disseminated in interstate relations. The most important decision-making forum for this policy are the global leaders' meetings, commonly known as the Earth's Summits or the Climate Summits. They were held over 20 times between 1992 and 2015. Along with development of climate policy and the long-standing lack of widely accepted policy successes by 2015, public discourse began to raise the issue of implementing new instruments that would improve the quality of the undertaken activities. One of such instruments is an involvement of partners on regional and local level to national and Europe wide policy.
In 2007, EU leaders adopted the 2020 climate package, in which three key objectives were appointed: (1) a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (compared to 1990 levels); (2) 20% share of renewable energy in total EU energy consumption; (3) a 20% incensement of energy efficiency. These are also the main goals of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. The package is a set of binding rules to ensure that the EU reaches its climate and energy targets by 2020. To achieve this, the EU takes action in various areas, one of the main financial instruments for achieving these goals is cohesion policy. The investment priorities of the cohesion policy for 2014-2020 were shaped along with climate package goals.
The main aim of this article is to answer the question, what are the changes in assumptions regarding the climate issues behind Polish regions’ development strategies? The research considers all sixteen regions in Poland. Using content analysis there is a comparison conducted between the documents prepared before (and for) the programming period 2007-2013 and 2014-2020. For this purpose QDA Miner and WORDStat software was used.