The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  26th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
V. Public Finance and Management
Author(s)  Octavian Moldovan 
  Babes-Bolyai University
Cluj-Napoca  Romania
Macarie Cornelia Felicia,  
 
 Title  Internal Public Auditing in Romania between 2006 and 2015
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Octavian Moldovan
Abstract  
  
The aim of this research is to analyze the evolution of internal public auditing (IPA from here on) in Romania between 2006 and 2015, in order to provide answers for the following research questions: (a) To what degree did central and local public institutions organized their IPA activities as a specialized department or in an associative structure?; (b) How did the human resources allocated to IPA activities transformed in this period (focusing on employment, their ability to cover organizational needs and the professional background of internal auditors); and (c) What was the type and nature of IPA missions conducted in this period? The document analyses conducted in order to provide answers to the aforementioned research questions are based on annual official reports published by the (Romanian) Central Unit for Public Internal Audit Harmonization, thus ensuring the reliability of this analysis.

Our main results indicate the existence of multiple differences between central and local public organizations, regarding their degree/level of IPA activities organization (especially before 2013) and the number of organizations each internal public auditor was tasked to audit (ranging from 1 at the central level to almost 8 at the local level). Unfortunately, the understaffing of IPA departments/bureaus is not conducive to an accurate identification and assessment of potential organizational weaknesses and risks, thus potentially hindering the performance of both central and local public institutions.

Furthermore, most IPA missions between 2006 and 2015 were focused on compliance activities, while less than 20% consisted of consulting/performance activities (which are supposed to assist management in ensuring sustainable organizational development). The disproportionate focus on compliance missions (especially regarding financial processes), although IPA at the international level also includes a series of other organizational aspects, can be explained by taking into account the professional background of internal public auditors, as over 85% of them are economists or have a related specialization. Diversifying IPA staff by broadening the recruitment and selection base to other professions could lead to a reorientation of these activities, improving the overall performance of public institutions.