The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  26th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
I. Working Group on Local Government
Author(s)  Tudor Cristian Ticlau 
  Babes-Bolyai University
Cluj-Napoca  Romania
Hintea Cristina,  
 
 Title  Public Marketing in Romania: Longitudinal Study on Use of Marketing Tools in Local Government
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Tudor Cristian Ticlau
Abstract  
  
According to an OECD (2011) study, general government expenditures accounted for around 45% of GDP on average for OECD member countries, with Denmark, France, Finland, Belgium passing the 55% mark. Taking into consideration on of the central roles of the state is to provide public goods and services that serve the needs of the citizens, the way in which these resources are managed in order to effectively do this is of high interest. Public marketing is an optimum platform for any public agency that wants to meet citizens needs and deliver real value (Kotler, Lee, 2007).
The current study investigates the extent to which public organizations use public marketing instruments in their daily activities. We were keen to find out the extent to which local authorities display and use ”formal marketing elements” in order to creat value for the public, using a comprehensive list of over 1o indicators. This was a longitudinal study, with 2 data collection points (2013, 2017) based on a quantitative method (document analysis). Official public information requests were sent out to a sample of over 400 local public institutions. The general goal translated into 3 specific objectives: (1) identify the usage level of public marketing tools by local authorities in Romania, focusing on specific formal components (e.g. financial allocation for specific marketing activities, existence of marketing department, marketing strategy, market research activities and so on); (2) classify authorities on a three level scale as low, medium and high intensity public marketing institutions and create a national institutional map based on the results (3) map out the evolution between the two data points to highlight progress.
Initial results indicate to a low level of marketing use in both decentralized and deconcentrated local public authorities and a slow evolution towards more diversified marketing tools. Recommendations on how to improve the use of public marketing instruments by local authorities are offered, based on the data analyzed.