The 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

An opportunity to learn from other researchers and other countries' experiences on certain topics.

G.A.C., Hungary, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Very well organised, excellent programme and fruitful discussions.

M.M.S., Slovakia, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

The NISPAcee conference remains a very interesting conference.

M.D.V., Netherlands, 25th Conference 2017, Kazan

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  26th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
V. Public Finance and Management
Author(s)  Juraj Nemec 
  Masaryk University
Brno  Czech Republic
Grega Matus, Orviská Marta,  
 
 Title  Factors Determining the Efficiency of Public Procurement in Slovakia
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Juraj Nemec
Abstract  
  
Most governments of the world still continue to deal with important fiscal imbalances because of the economic and financial crisis of 2008. Macro-responses have included increasing the International Monetary Fund (IMF) resources and coordinating a monetary policy between central banks and to some extent, a fiscal policy between national governments. Central banks, including the European Central Bank, have engaged in continual interest rate cuts to historically low levels, coupled with a measure called “quantitative easing”, which essentially increases money supply through the central bank buying up assets with money it creates. However, this deficit spending and process of quantitative easing cannot carry on indefinitely and the necessary repayments will mean constrained spending and increased taxes in the following years.
Almost all governments involved have and continue to respond by increasing taxes and decreasing expenditure. However, we propose that the focus should involve expenditure, not by lump sum (cross-sectional) expenditure cuts, but through improving efficiencies.
Public procurement, especially in transitional and post-transitional economies, is generally the major area for improving efficiencies. Many experts (e.g. Pavel, 2013) believe that such improvements will achieve 10–20% savings in public procurement under our current conditions. Potentially, this releases an amount equal to about 3% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for productive use!
The existing literature describes and analyses possible reasons for large inefficiencies in the public procurement processes. The common issue in literature is corruption. According to existing data, the general level of corruption in transitional and post-transitional economies is high (see for example the Corruption Perception Index 2014 prepared by the Transparency International) and unavoidably influences public procurement. The response of increased transparency does little to help, with it attracting only more sophisticated ways of channeling public resources through procurement. Another issue might be high transaction costs and limited competition for bids.
In this paper we plan to summarize the findings of our long term research on efficiency of public procurement in Slovakia. The analysis is based on our primary and secondary research and provides really interesting oversight of the situation in Slovakia.