The 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Thank you for the opportunity to be there, and for the work of the organisers.

D.Z., Hungary, 24th Conference 2016, Zagreb

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  25th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
I. Local Government
Author(s)  Iwona Sobis 
  University of Gothenburg
Göteborg  Sweden
Anna Cregård, University of Halmstad, Sweden 
 
 Title  Dissemination of Sustainability Information and its Effects on Local Sustainable Development. A Comparative Study between the Swedish and Polish Big Cities.
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Iwona Sobis
Abstract  
  
According to Action Agenda 21, adopted at the Rio Conference in 1992, sustainable development should be realized as the overall goal of development locally and globally. Economic growth, good living conditions, and protection of the earth's natural environment are very important to all people.
Existing research shows that legislative and administrative policy documents have impact on practical work with sustainable development nationally, regionally, and locally (Lodhia et al., 2012). Public sector agencies have a position to lead sustainable development and spread information about the results (Ball et al., 2006; Marcuccio & Steccolini, 2005; Osborne and Ball, 2011). They do that to show accountability and keep legitimacy. However, public sector authorities have to cooperate with other organizations and various stakeholders in this regard (Farneti & Guthrie, 2009; Adolfsson Jörby, 2002; Feichtinger & Pregernig 2005). Deegan et al., 2002; Wilmhurst & Frost, 2000; Steccolini, 2004 share the opinion that scholars focus mostly on content analysis of sustainable information like annual and sustainability reports, brochures, or other documents (e.g., Gonzalez and Perez-Chamorro, 2008). We focus instead on the dissemination of sustainability information among various stakeholders and its effect on sustainable development in big cities.
The research purpose is to describe and compare how the municipal authorities of big cities in Sweden and Poland are working in practice with the dissemination of sustainable information among stakeholders. What effects do dissemination of sustainability information have on sustainable development in investigated cities?
Big cities are chosen because the governance of those municipalities is somehat different from other cities, but in the mean time they are rolemodels to many other cities. Secondly, Poland during transition from socialism to a market economy and during waiting on accession to the EU, received a technical assistance from Sweden, which was very appreciated by the Polish authorities (Sobis 2002; Sobis & de Vries 2009). Thirdly, Sweden belongs to the leading countries in working with sustainable development, which suggests that Poland could learn from the best. Fourthly, both countries are members of the European Union and follow similar directives.
The research is based on state regulations, directives on sustainable development, municipal homepages, policy documents, official reports, and semi-structured interviews with key-respondents responsible for sustainable development.
Findings from our research indicate that the dissemination of sustainable information among citizens and stakeholders have strengthened the sustainability work in general. A municipality can be perceived as a precursor to follow for other organizations and other municipalities in both countries. The dissemination of sustainable information in Poland is not just bleak imitations of the Swedish municipal work. In both countries can be observed innovative work with sustainable information and development, simultaneously displaying respect to the EU general recommendations.
This kind of research is important since it makes us reflect that although the production and dissemination of sustainable information is time-consuming and not always proves useful in the short run, in the long run the spread of sustainable information may be surprisingly positive for sustainable development locally.