The 24th NISPAcee Annual Conference

Conference photos available

Conference photos available

In the conference participated 317 participants

Conference programme published

Almost 250 conference participants from 36 countries participated

Conference Report

The 28th NISPAcee Annual Conference cancelled

The 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 21 - October 23, 2021

The 2020 NISPAcee On-line Conference

The 30th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 2 - June 4, 2022

Well organized, as always. Excellent conference topic and paper selection.

M.S., Serbia, 23rd Conference 2015, Georgia

Perfect conference. Well organised. Very informative.

M.deV., Netherlands, 22nd Conference 2014, Hungary

Excellent conference. Congratulations!

S. C., United States, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

Thanks for organising the pre-conference activity. I benefited significantly!

R. U., Uzbekistan, 19th Conference, Varna 2011

Each information I got, was received perfectly in time!

L. S., Latvia, 21st Conference 2013, Serbia

The Conference was very academically fruitful!

M. K., Republic of Macedonia, 20th Conference 2012, Republic of Macedonia

 :: Anonymous user Login / Register 

Optimised for Tablet | Smartphone

 Paper/Speech Details of Conference Program  

for the  24th NISPAcee Annual Conference
  Program Overview
Main Conference Theme
Author(s)  Mateja Held 
  University of Zagreb
Zagreb  Croatia
 
 
 Title  Evaluation of the Administrative Courts’ Reform in Croatia
File   Paper files are available only for conference participants, please login first. 
Presenter  Mateja Held
Abstract  
  
Evaluation of the Administrative Courts' Reform in Croatia

This paper deals with the recent reform of administrative judiciary system, which was established in 1952, enacted by the Administrative Disputes Act in 2012. Although the reform was based on the series of documents, strategies and by experts in the field, the new system still suffers from inadequate regulation of administrative dispute in certain elements. The presentation is divided in three main parts – reform of administrative judiciary system, results of the reform and analysis of the existing problems.
The main focus of the first part will be the reform of administrative judiciary which started during the EU accession process, after the conclusion of association agreements and during the efforts to meet the criteria for joining the EU. The reasons for the reform were numerous, and as most important of those one could point out non conformity with the EU standards and acquis communautarie, absence of the appeal against the first instance judgement, a large number of pending cases before the court, no public hearing before the administrative court as the result of the reserve which Croatia put on the article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, no judicial control over the general acts, etc. EU document which was important for the reform regarding general acts was the Recommendation Rec (2004) 6 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on improvement of domestic remedies. The analysis will include various preparatory acts, draft acts and strategies adopted in the CARDS programme (Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation). The main objective of this programme was to strengthen the capacity of the Croatian Administrative Court in order to provide prompt and effective legal assistance in accordance with the principle of the rule of law. The main purpose of the reform was similar and it was reflected in three objectives: increasing the efficiency of court procedures, their shorter duration and reducing the backlog in solving them.
The second part of the presentation will include the analysis of the results of the reform. Newly adopted institutes will be presented, such as the current organisation of the administrative courts, the subject of the administrative dispute, appeal against the first instance judgement, the subject of the administrative dispute, the conceptual shift from the cassation to the reformation decision-making in the administrative dispute, etc.
The third part will focus on the detecting problems that persist in spite of the reform. Those include for example, the inadequate number of judges when deciding on the legality of individual acts and the regulation of the control of the legality of general acts. Some suggestions will be given for the improvement of the existing system, which consequently could help in protection of the individual rights of the citizens which is stated as one of the fundamental principle of the Croatian Administrative Disputes Act.